Editor's Note: Larry Benedict — the hedge fund legend who beat the S&P 500 by 18 times in 2025 and made his clients $95 million during the 2008 crisis — says Trump's installation of a new Federal Reserve chair is triggering the most significant shift in U.S. markets in nearly 20 years. He has already identified the one ticker he believes will be at the center of the money flows — and he's revealing it completely free. Click here to see the details or read more below…

Dear Reader,

Move your money as soon as possible.

That is the urgent message from Larry Benedict, the trader who generated $274 million in profits for his clients.

Click here to hear his warning

You see, every time the Federal Reserve makes a major move, certain assets move with it, and if you're positioned correctly, the returns can be extraordinary.

When the Fed cut rates in 2020, Larry's readers had the chance to make 62% from a single position.

When it signaled rate hikes in January 2022, they could have made 117% in under a month.

When Fed Chair Jerome Powell spoke at Jackson Hole, Larry had his readers positioned for an 89% gain in just 17 days.

Now, President Trump is installing a new Fed chair and Larry says it's triggering what could be the most significant shift in the U.S. financial system in nearly 20 years.

He has already identified the single ticker he says will be at the center of where the money flows.

Click here to discover the one move Larry is recommending now

Best wishes,

Lauren Wingfield
Managing Editor, The Opportunistic Trader

P.S. If you want to be positioned ahead of what Larry is calling the best setup he’s seen in 20 years, click here now.

Monday, August 17, 2026

One model charges pennies per ton; another demands millions per vessel.

Iran and Oman have agreed to split the Strait of Hormuz into two lanes. One runs through Iranian waters. The other runs through Omani waters. A U.S.-Iran military confrontation shut down most Hormuz traffic earlier this year. Daily transits fell from over 88 to as few as 10. Diplomats compare the new deal to the Strait of Malacca, where countries ask ships for voluntary contributions instead of tolls.

The Malacca contribution fund was seeded with $7.3 million over five years. Iran is charging $2 million per ship right now.

Those two numbers do not belong to the same model.

The Hormuz agreement is not about fees. Iran is converting wartime control of the strait into a permanent toll authority. Hormuz moves 20 million barrels of oil a day. The "voluntary" label is doing diplomatic work, not financial work. Three fee models, placed side by side, reveal the pattern.

Where should you invest $100 right now?

Elon Musk just invented and patented this new AI technology…

And he's predicting it will launch a NEW industry that will grow more than 7 million percent in the coming years.

Even if he's only 10% right, that would still be enough to grow $100 into more than $700,000.

Click here to see the details on what Elon Musk called "an infinite money glitch"

The Strait of Malacca sits between Malaysia, Indonesia, and Singapore. About a quarter of global trade passes through it. The three countries do not charge ships for passage. They fund safety and navigation aids through a contribution system. The Nippon Foundation backs it.

When the foundation launched the fund, it put in $7.3 million over five years. The target was $40 million a year. The rate: one cent per deadweight ton of shipping. A deadweight ton measures a ship's total carrying capacity. The fund never reached that target. A diplomat told IBTimes the model is "a voluntary carbon offset on a plane ticket."

That is one side of the comparison. Now look at the other.
Iran's deputy foreign minister said in early August that talks had reached fundamental understandings and were on the verge of being finalized. Iran has charged ships $1.5 million to $2 million per crossing since at least March. An Iranian parliamentary official confirmed the charges to Fars News Agency in June.

Observation: The Malacca fund generates low tens of millions per year. Iran's per-ship charge, scaled across even modest daily traffic, dwarfs that annual figure.
Interpretation: The two models operate at different orders of magnitude. One asks for pennies per ton. The other demands millions per ship.

Turkey offers a useful comparison. The Turkish Straits have the most established fee regime on any waterway. The Montreux Convention of 1936 gives Turkey the legal right to charge. Turkey's transport minister announced in June a per-ton fee of $6.70.

That treaty-backed system generates about $200 million a year. It is internationally recognized. It is nearly a century old.

Iran wants $1.5 million to $2 million per ship. Even Turkey's formal, legal toll does not come close per vessel.

Observation: The most established strait toll in the world generates $200 million a year at $6.70 per ton.
Interpretation: Iran's per-ship charge dwarfs even the Turkish model across any real volume of traffic.

Here is the math that breaks the Malacca comparison.

Bourse & Bazaar is a research outlet on Iran's economy. It estimated the ceiling of a generous voluntary model. At $100,000 per vessel across 600 large tankers, that yields about $60 million a year. Iran charges $1.5 million to $2 million per ship. Daily transits fell from over 88 to between 10 and 16. Even at reduced volume, the revenue dwarfs any voluntary fund.

But the money is not the real signal. The institution is.

In May, Iran created the Persian Gulf Strait Authority. The PGSA declared itself the legal representative of Iran for all Hormuz passage. It warned that transit now requires "full coordination" with Tehran. It is a government body with a mandate and an enforcement arm. That arm is tied to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, Iran's most powerful military branch.

Every other major strait has a multilateral framework. Turkey has the Montreux Convention from 1936. Denmark and the Malacca states operate under long-standing treaties and cooperative agreements. Hormuz has none. That vacuum persisted for decades, because regional tensions meant no country could agree on who governs passage. The PGSA fills that vacuum. What started as wartime improvisation is becoming permanent infrastructure.

Observation: Iran created a named government authority to administer Hormuz and rejected the voluntary fee model.
Interpretation: The institution is being built to outlast the interim agreement. The "voluntary" label describes the diplomatic surface. The PGSA is the structure underneath.

The 60-day interim window is the first signal to watch. If it expires and the PGSA remains, the toll authority is permanent. It becomes the new baseline.

The second signal is the rate. Do shipping companies pay a voluntary contribution or the $2 million rate? That tells you which model actually governs the strait. Words in a diplomatic agreement matter less than invoices.

The third signal is traffic volume. Before the confrontation, over 88 ships crossed Hormuz daily. Current volume is 10 to 16. As traffic recovers, the revenue math changes fast. Half the old baseline is 44 ships a day. At $1.5 million per ship, that is $66 million daily. Those costs flow into oil prices. Then into everything oil touches.

The Malacca model raises tens of millions over years. Iran charges millions per ship. The numbers do not describe the same system. What is being built at Hormuz is not a contribution fund. It is a toll authority over a chokepoint that moves 20 million barrels a day.

Iran holds physical control of Hormuz and is converting it into an administered corridor. The voluntary model cited to legitimize the arrangement raises almost nothing by design. The signal to watch is whether the institution outlasts the interim window.

Until next time,
The Navigator