Dear Friend,

SpaceX filed its S-1.

June 12 is now confirmed. $75 billion. Ticker SPCX. The largest IPO in history.

You will not get shares. The 21-bank syndicate already locked them up.

But the S-1 just exposed the one company Musk cannot operate without.

It's publicly traded. It's still cheap. And in 22 days, the whole world will know its name.

Dylan Jovine is giving it away — free — before the window closes.

Get the ticker before June 12 reprices everything »

“The Buck Stops Here,”
Kelly Maguire
Behind the Markets

Wednesday, May 27, 2026

The committee lost its only dove and gained no new one.

Kevin Warsh was sworn in as Federal Reserve chair on May 22. His first rate-setting meeting is June 16. That gives him twenty-five days.

But the committee already showed him what it will and will not do.

In April, the Federal Open Market Committee voted 8-4 to hold rates steady. Four dissents. That was the most since October 1992. The committee split three ways before Warsh had the job. The man who wanted cuts is gone. The data that would justify cuts is gone, too.

Warsh walks into a machine that is already running. The machine does not care who sits in the chair.

The Fed chair gets one vote on a twelve-member committee. Warsh replaced the only member who voted for cuts. Inflation jumped from 2.4% to 3.8% after the Iran oil shock. The committee's votes and the data feeding them matter more than any chair's preferences. No incoming chair in decades has had less room to move.

What if you could compress a lifetime of wealth-building…

Ten… twenty… even thirty years…

Into a single 24-hour window?

It sounds absurd.

But Elon Musk is about to make it a reality with something I'm calling…

"Day-One Retirement Plan." Click here to see the details

The April meeting held rates at 3.5% to 3.75%. That was the third straight hold. The vote was 8-4, but the four dissents pulled in opposite directions.

Stephen Miran, the outgoing chair, wanted a quarter-point cut. He was the only member who voted to lower rates. The other three dissenters were Beth Hammack, Neel Kashkari, and Lorie Logan. They wanted a different change. They objected to the statement language that implied the next rate move would be down. They voted against the statement, not the rate. Eight members accepted both the hold and the language. One wanted lower rates. Three wanted the dovish signal removed.

The contested sentence said the committee would consider "additional adjustments" to rates. Markets call this an easing bias. It signals that cuts remain the default direction because the most recent moves were cuts. The April minutes revealed "many" members wanted it removed entirely. The fight is no longer about when to cut. It is about whether to signal that cuts are still possible at all.

Michael Townsend, managing director at Schwab, put it plainly. "The most important letter in FOMC is the last one: C for committee."

Observation: The April vote split 8-4 across three factions, the widest divide since 1992.
Interpretation: No single faction controls the committee. The chair inherits a divided board with no majority for easing.

Warsh did not add a vote for cuts. He replaced the only vote for cuts.

Miran dissented at all six FOMC meetings he attended. He pushed for rate cuts every time. He projected a year-end rate nearly a full point below the committee median. He was the loudest dove on the board. Now he is gone.

Warsh takes Miran's seat. But Jerome Powell, the outgoing chair, stayed on as a governor. No outgoing chair had remained on the board since 1948. "The things that have happened in the last three months have left me with no choice but to stay until I see them through," Powell said after the April meeting. He keeps his vote.

The new chair lost his predecessor's strongest ally for lower rates. And his predecessor is still in the room.

President Trump has made clear he expects lower rates. Warsh told lawmakers he will never "predetermine" rates at the president's request. But the real constraint is not political pressure. The real constraint is votes.

Observation: Warsh replaced Miran, the committee's only cut vote, while Powell remains as a voting governor.
Interpretation: The committee lost its dove and gained no new one. The chair's room to push for easing shrank.

Before the U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iran in late February, inflation had eased to 2.4%. The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported April CPI at 3.8%. That is the highest reading since May 2023.

Energy prices drove over 40% of that increase. Gas costs $4.50 a gallon. That is the number the committee sees.

The April meeting minutes showed the constraint. A majority of participants said they would support hiking rates if inflation stays above 2%. The current reading is nearly double that threshold.

Futures markets reflect that math. CME FedWatch, which tracks rate expectations priced into futures contracts, showed a December hike at 51% probability as of May 15. J.P. Morgan puts the chance of a cut at any remaining 2026 meeting below 3%.

The data does not simply fail to support cuts. It points the other direction. A majority of members set 2% as their threshold for considering hikes. Inflation sits at 3.8%. The math does the work.

Observation: CPI jumped from 2.4% to 3.8% after the Iran oil shock, with energy driving over 40% of the increase.
Interpretation: The inflation reading locks the committee into holding or hiking. A majority of members set a 2% threshold for considering hikes, and the current reading nearly doubles it.

The next PCE inflation reading lands on May 28. PCE is the Fed's preferred price gauge. That number arrives nineteen days before the June meeting. If it confirms what CPI showed, the hold becomes even firmer.

The June meeting also releases the dot plot, where each member marks where they see rates at year-end. The March version showed most members expected rates between 3.25% and 3.75%. Watch whether those dots shift upward. A cluster above the current rate would signal the committee leans toward hikes.

Then there is the statement itself. Does the easing-bias sentence survive? If the committee drops the word "additional," the implication of future cuts is gone. That tells you the center of gravity has shifted.

Bank of America sees no cut before the second half of 2027. The structure was readable before Warsh sat down. The machine runs on votes and data. Right now, both point in the same direction.

The Fed's new chair arrives with less room to move rates than any incoming chair in decades. The committee fractured, the only dove is gone, and inflation nearly doubled after the oil shock. The signals to watch: May 28 PCE, the June dot plot, and whether the easing-bias language survives.

Until next time,
The Navigator