Logo
SUBSCRIBE
Logo
SUBSCRIBE
Jason Van Steenwyk
Jason Van Steenwyk

Mar 16, 2026

We Need to Talk About The 60-40 Portfolio

Investors are rethinking diversification as stocks and bonds move together.

Your browser does not support the audio element.

In 2022, traditional diversification assumptions collided with a new macro reality:

U.S. inflation spiked up to 9.1% in June 2022, the highest level in four decades. That same year, U.S. equities fell by 18%. Inflation expectations drove yields higher, repricing bonds at much lower levels. Core U.S. bond holdings experienced their worst annual decline since the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate’s inception in 1976, falling in the low-teens.

For investors who relied on the historical negative correlation between equities and Treasuries, the experience required reconsideration of embedded portfolio assumptions.

The Return of the Triple Red Event

Fast forward to 2025 and early 2026:

We haven’t had a period where bonds, Treasuries, and the dollar all fell at the same time - a “triple-red event” in market parlance. For some 25 years, at least one of those asset classes would hold steady in times of uncertainty.

But in just the past 12 months, we’ve had two such events: The Trump Tariff rollout in the spring and summer 2025, and the Greenland controversy of early 2026.

The Shift in Stock–Bond Correlation

Overall, the correlation between stocks and bonds has spiked. Between 2002 and 2020, the correlation coefficient between U.S. stocks and bonds bounced around negative 0.4. But Covid pressures and inflation expectations pushed correlations much higher, to just over 0.

It’s the first time we’ve seen stock and bond correlation turn positive since the 90s.

Source: MSCI Research, “Are You as Diversified As You Want to Be in 2026?”

What does this mean? The effectiveness of the traditional reliance on stocks and bonds to provide effective diversification against one another is fading. The traditional 60-40 split between stocks and bonds in millions of individual portfolios is no longer providing the diversification benefit we have taken for granted for a generation.

The Pattern Extends Beyond Treasuries

Over the past two decades, corporate bonds, high-yield credit, municipal bonds, global bonds, REITs, and TIPS have exhibited increasing correlation with equities, according to Morningstar analysis. Several of these segments have posted losses along with equities on multiple occasions.

Gold and Real Assets

Gold continues to serve as a long-term hedge against fiscal profligacy and inflation. Strong central bank demand has reinforced that role for the metal in recent months.

But gold’s short-term performance has been inconsistent. When liquidity is strong and real interest rates are stable or falling, gold has often risen alongside stocks. During periods when investors are forced to sell assets broadly to raise cash, we’ve seen some selling pressure on gold prices as well.

Concentration and Systemic Exposure

Index concentration introduces another layer of correlation risk.

The rise of AI-linked mega-cap firms has pushed the S&P 500’s top-ten weight to heady levels.

As of early 2026, the combined market capitalization of the so-called “Magnificent Seven” (Nvidia, Apple, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, and Tesla) amounts to over 40% of the entire market capitalization of the S&P 500.

Just one company, Nvidia, accounts for over 7% of the index.

As older investors remember from our experiences in 2000 and 2008-2009, markets can turn against high-flying sectors and media darlings with alarming speed. There isn’t much intra-stock diversification to be had when so few companies, all in related industries, dominate so much of the U.S. stock market.

Meanwhile, there’s a certain segment of people telling you not to worry about it.

Beyond 60-40

Institutional portfolios are evolving beyond a binary stock-bond structure.
Investors seeking stronger diversification from traditional U.S. stocks and bonds are increasingly looking overseas for better valuations and adding alternative strategies, commodities, and selected digital assets to broaden their sources of return.

A recent BlackRock report shows that institutional client allocations to alternative strategies in 2025 have exploded by 3x-4x compared to 2020–2024, attracting 8% of fund flows in 2025. That’s up from just 2% during the five-year period from 2020-2024, and up from 8% prior to that.

The most popular alternative investments for BlackRock clients include “liquid alternatives” such as global macro strategies, managed futures, equity market-neutral funds, and multi-strategy vehicles designed to generate returns from dispersion rather than direction. Allocators are also increasing exposure to infrastructure, commodities, and short-duration credit.

What to Do Now

Investors may wish to reassess their long-standing assumptions about correlation and portfolio risk budgeting:

  • Monitor rolling correlation and shared variance across asset classes.

  • Stress-test portfolios under simultaneous equity and duration drawdowns.

  • Reduce reliance on long-duration bonds as the primary hedge.

  • Incorporate macro and trend-following strategies that benefit from dispersion.

  • Consider real assets with explicit inflation linkage.

  • Evaluate concentration risk within major equity indices.

Correlation regimes evolve. Investors and advisors must adapt accordingly.

Boom Labs focuses on identifying those regime shifts before you hear about them on CNN. Global bond issuance may approach $29 trillion in 2026.

Until next time,

The Navigator

Subscribe to
The Navigator

Check out my other publications

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use